As of September 30, 2005, the North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium is no longer in operation.
NCRTEC  Professional Development Planning and Evaluation Teaching and Learning


Technology Standards for School Administrators

Introduction and Context

The Collaborative for Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA Collaborative) has facilitated the development of a national consensus on what P-12 administrators should know and be able to do to optimize the effective use of technology. This consensus is presented by the Collaborative (November 2001) as Technology Standards for School Administrators (TSSA).

The Collaborative believes that comprehensive implementation of technology is, in itself, large-scale systemic reform. Leadership plays a key role in successful school reform. The Collaborative's standards, therefore, focus on the role of leadership in enhancing learning and school operations through the use of technology.

These standards are indicators of effective leadership for technology in schools. They define neither the minimum nor maximum level of knowledge and skills required of a leader, and are neither a comprehensive list nor a guaranteed recipe for effective technology leadership. Rather, these standards are a national consensus among educational stakeholders of what best indicates accomplished school leadership for comprehensive and effective use of technology in schools. The standards challenge almost every school administrator in some areas, yet each individual standard is attainable by the professional educational leader. Although a national consensus, in no way should these standards inhibit new development, innovation, or progress for schools or for school leadership.

The TSSA Collaborative and the many professionals who contributed to this effort realize the wide range of roles administrators play in schools, even when titles are similar. School and system size, degree of site-based governance, community characteristics, and strengths of individual administrators are but a few of the parameters that may cause variations in actual job roles. For this reason, wise consumers of these standards will apply this national resource in a way that acknowledges the local context of school leadership.

A rich array of expectations exists for use of these standards. They will find application in:

  • administrator preparation and professional development program design
  • assessment and evaluation
  • role definition and job descriptions
  • individual and system accountability
  • accreditation of schools and of administrator preparation programs
  • certification (credentialing) of administrators
  • self-assessment and goal setting
  • design of technology tools for school administrators

The audiences for these standards also are varied. School boards, administrators, human resources staff, staff developers, higher education personnel, and state education agencies will make use of this resource. Others include state and federal policy-makers, industry representatives and service providers, professional organizations, parents, taxpayers, and other community constituents. This places priority, then, on clarity and simplicity of language, free from specific education jargon. The document speaks to a variety of audiences, and it encourages accomplished leaders to stay abreast of current strategies and accepted principles as these evolve.

An underlying assumption to these standards is that administrators should be competent users of information and technology tools common to information-age professionals. The effective 21st Century administrator is a hands-on user of technology. Much of the benefit of technology is lost for administrators who rely on an intermediary to do their e-mail, manipulate critical data, or handle other technology tasks for them. While technology empowers administrators by the information it can readily produce and communicate, it exponentially empowers the administrator who masters the tools and processes that allow creative and dynamic management of available information.

Administrators who recognize the potential of technology understand that leadership has a responsibility to ensure digital equity. They must also know that technology can unlock tremendous potential in learners and staff with special and diverse needs. Administrators are responsible for incorporating assistive technologies that enable a school system to more comprehensively serve its constituents.

Highly successful school districts carefully align educational initiatives to address district priorities. Leaders must acknowledge this need for alignment as technology is integrated across the district. The shared vision for technology must be consistent with the district's overall educational vision, and technology plans must smoothly integrate with overall planning for school effectiveness.

The vision of the TSSA Collaborative is that the Technology Standards for School Administrators identify knowledge and skills that constitute the “core”—what every P-12 administrator needs regardless of specific job role—and, then extends the core to include the specific tasks of administrators in each of three job roles: (1) superintendent and executive cabinet, (2) district-level leaders for content-specific or other district programs, and (3) campus-level leaders, including principals and assistant principals. This phase of the effort does not address role-specific standards for business officers or technology directors.

The TSSA Collaborative recommends the standards be communicated as six standards statements along with a corresponding set of performance indicators for each. In addition, there are three sets of role-specific technology leadership tasks describing different expectations in three distinct administrative job roles. Also included are illustrative scenarios of practice corresponding to each job role. For clarity and brevity, performance indicators and leadership tasks that correspond to more than one standard are listed with the most closely aligned standard.

“Integrating technology throughout a school system is, in itself, significant systemic reform. We have a wealth of evidence attesting to the importance of leadership in implementing and sustaining systemic reform in schools. It is critical, therefore, that we attend seriously to leadership for technology in schools.”

Don Knezek, Director
TSSA Standards Project
ISTE

Previous | Contents | Next

Copyright © 2001 by the TSSA Collaborative. All rights reserved.


 

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright © Learning Point Associates. All Rights Reserved.