The students were assessed on a couple of different things. They
were individually assessed on their travel poster. They were given
a list of criterion that they had to meet for it to be an A, B,
C, D, or an F. An F was needs improvement, so F was not acceptable.
D was not acceptable. They had to work on the travel poster until
it was a C or better. Then the same thing with the other components.
They were given a criterion of what was acceptable in their journal
and what constituted an A, B, C, and so forth. The same thing on
their Hyperstudio stack. We had a rubric for that also. They were
given that information before they created their Hyperstudio stack.
The Hyperstudio stack was assessed for each individual card and
then for the total presentation.
